


![]() ![]() Past Articles
Commonwealth v. Wagstaff
Commonwealth v. Thomas Commomwelth v. Bryant Supreme Court Upholds Dog Sniffs at Traffic Stops Snooping By Satellite Supreme Court Spotlight Nextel Cellular Phone Warning Coatesville Begind Drug Cleanup PA Drug Enforcement Coordination System Hazleton Drug Task Force Vehicle with Booby-Trapped Airbag Thermal Imaging
Commonwealth v. Newton
2007 PA Super 409, ___A.2d___ Decided: Dec 31, 2007 Evidence was not admissible under the plain view doctrine when the officer entered a motel room to seize viewed evidence rather than monitoring the room until a warrant could be obtained. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. Thompson 2007 PA Super 372, ___A.2d___ Decided: Dec 10, 2007 The Commonwealth failed to prove that contraband seized in a pat-down had the mass and contour that would make its criminal character immediately apparent. The Superior Court suppressed the evidence. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. West 937, ___A.2d___ Decided: Nov 28, 2007 Police properly seized a vehicle when they had reason to believe it would be used in the sale of drugs. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. Paul 2007 PA Super 134, ___A.2d___ Decided: May 15, 2007 The Superior Court reversed a lower court's reduction of a mandatory sentence, because the arresting officer had not engaged in sentencing entrapment. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. McAliley 2007 PA Super 55, ____A.2d____ Decided: March 5, 2007 The Superior Court upheld admissibility of the evidence because the officers had exigent circumstances to perform a warrantless search of a home. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. Steward 2007 PA Super 46, ____A.2d____ Decided: February 22, 2007 The Superior Court reversed the lower court’s suppression of evidence, obtained pursuant to a wiretap, because the affidavit for the wiretap was sufficient to obtain a wiretap and the Wiretap Act would not permit suppression of the evidence in this case. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. Wells 16 A.2d 1192 Decided: January 31, 2007 The Superior Court upheld a lower court’s denial of a suppression motion because the officers who arrested a drug dealer had probable cause to make the arrest. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. Dukeman No. 888 MDA 2005 Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2/6/07) Search Warrant, probable cause for was established by confidential informants and police surveillance. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. Yancoskie 2006 PA Super 367, ____ A.2d ____ Decided: December 14, 2006 The Superior Court held that a spouse may consent to a warrantless search of the married couple’s home when the other spouse is not at home. (Read Entire Update) Commonwealth v. McCall 2006 PA Super. 329, ____A.2d____ Decided: November 16, 2006 The Superior Court held that there was sufficient evidence to uphold the trial court’s conviction for criminal conspiracy and PWID when the suspect acted as a lookout during drug transactions and he was carrying a large amount of money in small denominations when arrested. (Read Entire Update) |